More evidence that Dalai Lama is a brutal Dictator

DaLai Lama used the threats of violence and death to suppress the followers of Dorje Shugden (<– dalai’s teacher). What is so laughable is that the “Tibetan in Exile government” claimed that they have a Democratic Theocracy

Here is some background videos made by Swiss public television. Broadcasted on 01/05/1998.

Dalai Lama and Dorje Shugden



Filed under China, History, References, Religion, Tibet, Video

4 responses to “More evidence that Dalai Lama is a brutal Dictator

  1. phelim

    It seems quite clear that the DL is very keen to destroy the practice of DS, and has his people dealing with this. he is unable to offer any rational explanation for this action, he is unwilling to discuss it openly and is relying on his cartoon good guy image to let him get away with it, a bit like michael jackson did with all those children. This man has lived surrounded by people who never question his opinions, he is living in comfort while his people (who havn’t elected him)live in poverty. I think it’s right to question what he’s up to and reasonable to expect a response. obviously his own people face recriminations for disobeying him as can be clearly evidenced. I am very distressed by the whole situation but I’m willing to face it with an open mind and to put aside my preconceptions of how marvelous the DL is,

  2. Dharmapal

    Here is a great interview about the subject from ABC Radio National Radio taken from the blogspot (which has a lot of great posts):

    The Dalai Lama faces protests from within the Shugden Buddhist community on his Australian tour, 11th June 2008

    This week the Dalai Lama returns to Australia in fact for the second time in a little over a year. And as we go to air this morning, he’s giving a press conference in Sydney.
    CHANTING ‘Dalai Lama stop lying’ ‘Religion Freedom”

    Stephen Crittenden: That’s a recent protest rally outside the Albert Hall in London.

    The reasons behind these protests are either incredibly simple or incredibly complicated. The simple explanation is that for some years the Dalai Lama has been trying to eradicate the veneration of an obscure Tibetan deity called Dorje Shugden. Followers of Dorje Shugden say he’s an emanation of the Buddha; the Dalai Lama says he is an evil spirit.

    But there’s also a more complex explanation. For years, the Dalai Lama has been attempting to unite the main strands or lineages of Tibetan Buddhism under his spiritual authority. But he’s running up against fundamentalist groups even within his own Gelugpa strand, many of them Western Buddhists. And as he’s tried to exclude the practice of praying to Dorje Shugden, Dorje Shugden seems to have become more and more central to their practice.

    They say the Dalai Lama is a hypocrite who campaigns for human rights in Tibet but persecutes his own people, and that monks and nuns have been forbidden to follow Dorje Shugden and when they resist they have been ejected from monasteries.

    So who or what is Dorje Shugden, and who are these saffron-clad protestors? Kelsang Pema is a spokesman for the Western Shugden Society. She’s a British Buddhist nun who has been a prominent figure in protest rallies in the UK and she’s just flown into Sydney.

    Kelsang Pema: Dorje Shugden is a Buddha from the Buddhist tradition. He’s a deity who has been prayed to and whose teachings have been followed for up to 400 years. The Dalai Lama himself practiced this prayer and the teachings until the 1970s when he had either a change of faith or a change of heart. And he himself personally decided not to follow this any more. It’s a very simple practice which Buddhist people follow in order to develop pure minds of love, compassion, wisdom and spiritual protection.

    Now the Dalai Lama has had a change of faith and not being satisfied with his own change of faith he decided to inflict this upon the Buddhist community in general internationally, and this is the problem that we face at the moment, because he is saying that people who follow this deity, Dorje Shugden, are no longer Buddhist.

    Stephen Crittenden: Why is he opposed to it? My understanding is that this is a fairly unusual practice, is that right?

    Kelsang Pema: I would say it’s definitely not an unusual practice, it’s 400 years old.

    Stephen Crittenden: That’s a pretty short length of time in Buddhist terms I suppose.

    Kelsang Pema: No, not when you consider that the new tradition the Dalai Lama himself created is only about 15 years old.

    Stephen Crittenden: Am I right in thinking that Dorje Shugden is a somewhat malevolent emanation of the Buddha?

    Kelsang Pema: Oh, absolutely not, no. He’s a protector, and protector from the point of view of as I say his purpose is simply to encourage people to develop pure minds of love, compassion, wisdom and spiritual protection, they’re not malevolent, the practice is not harmful and it cannot have any harmful effects, because that would be complete contradiction to the nature of the practice.

    Stephen Crittenden: As it’s been explained to me, the background to this story is that the Dalai Lama over many years now, has been trying to unify all the major strands of Tibetan Buddhism, and that your group is really resisting his spiritual authority, and that the Dalai Lama has run up against the cult of Dorje Shugden. It’s a practice that he sees as an obstacle in the path to this greater unification of the various strands that he’s trying to bring about.

    Kelsang Pema: Not entirely correct, one because Dorje Shugden practice is not cultic; second, he’s not running up against us, he himself is causing division within the British community because his two reasons that he’s publicly given for abandoning these practices. 1) it causes his lifespan to shorten; and 2) it interferes with Tibetan independence. Well the guy is 72 years old, so it’s obviously not very harmful to his life span, and it actually has no ability to harm anybody’s lifespan, let alone the Dalai Lama’s and second, he’s publicly said many times recently, that he’s not interested in Tibetan independence. So if they’re the two valid reasons he’s given, then there’s no valid reason left for abandoning the practice.

    Stephen Crittenden: But is it true that your group is a rejectionist group within the Gelugpa tradition, a movement that rejects the spiritual authority of the Dalai Lama?

    Kelsang Pema: No, that’s not correct, because if the Dalai Lama would just allow people to have religious freedom, they’d be very happy to accept him. I think one gross misunderstanding in the West is that the Dalai Lama is perceived to be the Buddhist leader per se. He’s not. If you got to Burma, Sri Lanka and so forth, ask those Buddhists who’s their Buddhist leader, definitely they would not say the Dalai Lama, and even within Tibet, Tibetan Buddhism, the position of Dalai Lama has never had authority over the other three schools of Tibetan Buddhism. Only now in this century, during the time of this 14th Dalai Lama has such a proposed unification been proposed.

    Stephen Crittenden: That’s why I raised the question. I mean what the Dalai Lama’s project has been over recent decades, he’s been trying to unify all the major strands of Tibetan Buddhism under his authority, that’s correct, isn’t it?

    Kelsang Pema: According to him, yes. But if you check with each of the other schools, actually this is not correct, because each of the other three schools also are fighting an internal turmoil because the Dalai Lama is cutting of limbs of those branches also. The Karmapas, for example, they’ve been paralysed for many years because the Dalai Lama is interfering with their tradition. In the same way he’s now trying to reorganize the Gelugpa school.

    Stephen Crittenden: So this is as much to do with the authority of the Dalai Lama as it is to do with a simple prayer?

    Kelsang Pema: I think the two become mixed because of the Dalai Lama’s own agenda. As we all know, he has two hats, he has his political and he has his religious, and it definitely seems that he’s using both hats to accomplish one aim, and this is where a lot of the problems are stemming from.

    Stephen Crittenden: How many Buddhists around the world follow Dorje Shugden?

    Kelsang Pema: There are actually millions of them internationally, and even within Tibet alone, over one-third of the population relied upon the practice of Dorje Shugden.

    Stephen Crittenden: But your group, if I’m correct, your group has grown up in the West. Are you part of the New Kadampa tradition?

    Kelsang Pema: No, we’re the Western Shugden Society.

    Stephen Crittenden: Right, and they’re separate groups?

    Kelsang Pema: They’re completely separate, the New Kadampa tradition is a registered company and charity, the Western Shugden Society is simply a group of Dorje Shugden practitioners who come together to be heard by the Dalai Lama, because for 20 years individual practitioners have been writing letters requesting audiences, sending faxes to the Dalai Lama requesting him to explain his position and to basically allow religious freedom to prevail within the Buddhist community, and he’s not even acknowledged such requests. So therefore we’ve decided together to unify and with one voice ask him.

    Stephen Crittenden: Right. I have to say I’ve read your letter on your website. It’s a pretty tough, strident letter. It’s really a letter of demand, I’m not surprised he hasn’t answered it.

    Kelsang Pema: Well considering we’ve sent countless letters and petitions over the course of 20 years, we have no choice, we were forced into a corner, you know, especially when in January he initiated a referendum which basically if you follow his view, you receive an identity card, which is your passport to human freedom within the Tibetan in Exile community. Without it, and that means if you continue to practice Dorje Shugden you’re a victim to any number of atrocities.

    Stephen Crittenden: You’re following him wherever he goes around the world on his travels, protesting. And this will be the first big protest of this kind in Australia.

    Kelsang Pema: Correct. We started in America in April. We were in Germany with three demonstrations and three recently in the UK, and now we have them in Australia.

    Stephen Crittenden: And will these be peaceful protests?

    Kelsang Pema: Absolutely. We have completely pure intention and motivation and our intention is simply to protect one pure ancient lineage from being destroyed without valid reason and our motivation is compassion. So there’s no anger, there’s no hostility. We’re just looking for a peaceful resolution. Of course we make noise, but without noise we’re not heard, and that’s been proved over 20 years through the correspondence that he’s ignored.

    Stephen Crittenden: Pema, given the political situation that the Dalai Lama is dealing with at present with the Chinese and the Tibetan situation, I have to ask you the question that most Australians are sure to be asking: are you agents of the Chinese Communist Party or are you their dupes?

    Kelsang Pema: Absolutely not. You can check me out, do whatever you like, I’ve got no connections with the Chinese at all, and I have to say to you that this is just again the propaganda of the Dalai Lama’s camp because there’s no valid reason for claiming that.

    Stephen Crittenden: But surely it’s nothing to do with propaganda to make the point that your protest at this extremely inauspicious time, can only, surely it can only, undermine the Dalai Lama’s authority and weaken the situation of the Tibetan people. The Chinese must be laughing their heads off.

    Kelsang Pema: I don’t know what the Chinese are doing but I wouldn’t say this is inauspicious when I’m witnessing people being denied medicine, people being denied education, being ostracised from their homes, being vicitmised and threatened simply because they want to maintain this prayer. They don’t want to encourage other people to practice it, they just simply want to get on with their own spiritual life, and that’s happening because of the Dalai Lama initiating, endorsing, and proactively campaigning for the abolishing of this practice.

    Stephen Crittenden: Where is this persecution that you’re alleging? Where is it happening?

    Kelsang Pema: It’s happening right now as I speak in India, and even last week in Paris, the Dalai Lama’s own sister was travelling around encouraging people to abandon this practice, and in America also.

    Stephen Crittenden: Is it true that the Panchen Lama, the fake Panchen Lama, the Chinese Panchen Lama has got himself mixed up in this controversy? I know he’s been photographed in front of an image of the Dorje Shugden?

    Kelsang Pema: I don’t feel I’m in a position to comment because I don’t know much about that situation.

    Stephen Crittenden: That’s Kelsang Pema, who’s a spokesman for the Western Shugden Society.

  3. Dharmapal

    Verifiable sources from the Tibetan settlements in India came through in March that:

    * Agents of the Dalai Lama are trying to destroy Palgyeling Monastery in Nepal.
    * a small mob supportive of the Dalai Lama’s ban on Dorje Shugden burnt down the house and hotel of Tenzing Choegyal (Zongkar Choede) in New Delhi last Thursday.
    * A doctor who was helping Dorje Shugden practitioners was attacked yesterday at a clinic in a Tibetan settlement (Ooti) that was giving out medicines for tuberculosis.
    * The Dalai Lama’s sister Pema is in Paris starting the forced signature campaign of Tibetans in France.
    * The forced signature campaign is being arranged for Madison, US, in July 2008.

    Meanwhile, the Dalai Lama has been in England talking about tolerance, religious harmony and the need for dialog with one’s enemies. He has still refused every single request to discuss the unlawful ban on the worship of Dorje Shugden.


    Today the entire Tibetan population is being forced to hold an Identity Card, the YELLOW CARD, proving that they took the oath swearing (1) not to worship Dorje Shugden, and (2) not to have any material or spiritual relationship with Dorje Shugden practitioners.

    This segregates and denies the human rights of both monastics and lay families.

    Segregation in the monasteries

    Buddhist monks and nuns who do not swear and are not given the Yellow Card are:

    * Not allowed to eat with others
    * Deprived of food. They are not allowed in any of the monastery’s kitchens. Even if they receive some external help for their survival, they cannot buy food from the monastery’s shop or anywhere in the nearby Tibetan settlements
    * Not allowed to set foot in their main temple,
    * Not allowed to attend the daily monastic gatherings of prayers, rituals and debates
    * Having to be protected by Indian police to attend the sacred yearly Monlam Chenmo Festival, created by their religious founder Je Tsongkapa.
    * Receiving violent threats in the neighbouring Tibetan settlements, cowardly posted during the night

    It is forbidden to talk to them. It is forbidden to walk close to them. If you see one of them, you have to deviate your steps to not cross his or her path.

    Segregation in the lay community

    Lay Tibetans have been made to swear the double oath of not worshipping the Protector Dorje Shugden themselves as well as forsaking all contact with the monastic practitioners.

    Those who do not swear and are not given the Yellow Card:

    * Are not allowed to travel in the same taxicab or rickshaw with other Tibetans.
    * Cannot purchase even the most essential groceries (their children cannot even buy candy)
    * Eat in any restaurant
    * Lose their jobs
    * Have their children expelled from school

    Definition of Segregation from Cornell: 3 -Segregation -1. enforced separation of groups: the practice of keeping ethnic, racial, religious, or gender groups separate, especially by enforcing the use of separate schools, transportation, housing, and other facilities, and usually discriminating against a minority group.
    4 -A civil right is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury. Examples of civil rights are freedom of speech, press, and assembly [.] and the right to equality in public places.
    Discrimination occurs when the civil rights of an individual are denied or interfered with because of their membership in a particular group or class. (Cornell University Law School).]

    Does the Dalai Lama have the right to do this?

    Although the world has been served an image of the Dalai Lama as the religious leader — a Pope of sorts — of all Buddhists, he is not. He does not have any religious authority to do what he is doing. In a general way this is because Buddhism accepts all internal religious beliefs and doesn’t harbor the notion of persecuting heresy, and in particular because there is no level of authority in the Buddhist religion to order or implement a religious persecution.

    Who is responsible for the ban, Yellow Card and resulting penalties for those who disobey?

    Everything going on now is the direct responsibility of the Dalai Lama. He has been campaigning personally to push the abbots and monks to do the referendum and make others take the double oath.

    He is responsible for the persecution because he chose the necessary words to push Tibetans to become the tormentors of their fellow exiles by repeating four calumnies over and over again:

    1-The worshipping of Dorje Shugden endangers his life
    2-It harms the cause of Tibet.
    3-Practitioners assassinated three monks in Dharamsala in the 1990s
    4-Practitioners are working for the Chinese to harm the cause of Tibet

    To measure how deep the crisis goes, consider the following statement by Ngawang Tenpa, Officer of the Cholsum organization, the largest regional group in Tibetan politics:

    “It is possible to think of a time when we will make friends with the Chinese, but with these (Dorje Shugden) people – never.”

  4. Tibetian Ancestry

    Why doesn’t anyone ever verify any accusations made by the Dalai Lama and his many organizations runned by his family, relatives through marriage, former slave owners/lords, employees, etc. against China? So many of you jump to his side without knowing any facts, other than hearsay. If you ask a former slave owner /ruling class their depiction of the same past/history as a former slave or serf, there would be a vast difference. Sorry, but my family, have been through your unholinesses dictatorship, and it was hell on earth not Shangrila. Thank you and good luck to you all. We Tibetians of the majority who chose to stay are now free! Thanks to China, yes, China abolished slavery!
    dalai lama and the ruling class at the time, was not afraid of the Chinese Gov’t, they protected him and the others to leave without us the former slaves and serfs from causing harm to them, so get that straight naive ones, thank you. Please, please do not be manipulated by western news media, you are not getting the truth.

    google: nazi and the dalai lama, or dalai lama and hitler ties, etc.

    Visit anywhere you have prejudices towards, China, Cuba, Venezuela, etc. Experience for yourself their society, people, news/media, culture, laws, businesses, etc., and then provide an opinion. For all the haters, naive people and western media puppets, live life first hand, not as a spectator or through others experiences, please.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s