No1: The “religious artifacts” aren’t actually condoned by the current dalai lama. if u haven’t noticed, no currently recognized religion sacrifices humans anymore

No2: the dalai lama doesnt condone these either. If u add dates to these photos, we will certainly acknowledge them.

No3: The dalai lama isnt befriending these people and he is definably does not agree with what these people are doing. He is merely trying to coerce them into quitting their evil ways.

No4: ok, i dont know how Osama B*i*n Laden is a CIA agent. Saddam Hussein is an enemy of the state and is dead. Pinochet is also dead and im sure a pure, Buddhist man like the Dalai Lama would want to affiliate himself with them.

No5: His followers are protesting against the Chinese government. They are also monks, its not in their nature to hurt anyone unless its deemed necessary for their cause. Monks have set themselves on fire in protest, rather than hurt other people. And dont go on about Shaolin monks and how they waged war with people.

And by the way, the real question isnt “what would Jesus do?” its “what has Jesus done?”

“This is just about the mindset. The author knows far too well about what he wrote and he and his editors could well predict the reactions from the readers like us—furious, upset, and disgusting feelings, you name it but at the end of the day, who cares? One of the replies by D Hsu is well written but question is, in the first place, is this just a trap? Americans or who reads the WSJ are perceivably educated (which means there is no way a reply will change their perception, at all!).To put this in a simply way, —Fruit of the poisonous tree—this is the departing point of the majority of westerner. A communist China is no different from a USSR or any totalitarian regime. Everything there is evil indeed. So I honestly doubt the usefulness of our replies. When those guys, like Michael Wong, a Formosaian maybe, have nothing to refute they again could assume a moral high ground and label us as brainwashed.(he could even quote a few Chinese professor’s afterdinner remarks as a notation to substantiate his points, come on Michael, you are just too funny! You apparently need to travel to Shanghai more frequently). Anyway, I guess the best to do is to remind those who are genuinely curious about China and its many domestic policies– for fun, read it and leave it. Otherwise, study before speak up.”

He is just a tool for the West to curb Chinese development.

Jesus? Check this out and save yourself.
http://www.lionsgate.com/religulous/

Most of Americans are so brainwashed that they can’t think straight. Just let it be and accept it as a fact.

Just like we have a maker so does he, if the man is wrong about any thing he have done the same creator knows how to correct the situation.

Until evidence is drawn placing he in direct viloation of misrepresentation, let God do God business.

”

*
Journal Community
o close window
Send a Message
Type your personal message.
Journal Community
o close window
Your message has been sent.
o Close window
Message
*
Journal Community
o close window
Make a Connection
Type your personal message.
Journal Community
o close window
Your message has been sent.
o Close window
Connect

The report will be more balanced if Mr. Restall could

1. Tell readers that historically the Uighurs are also new immigrants in Xinjiang. They have been living in Xinjiang, especially the northern part including Urumqi, for no more than 300 years while the Chinese started settlement there 2200 years ago. It should be more complicated than simply implying that historically the Han Chinese have never existed there.

2. Elaborate how much Ms. Kadeer knew about the riots before it started and what attitudes she had about the killings, pro or against?

3. Let readers know that among the 197 deaths in the riot in Urumqi, about 170 were Han Chinese who stand for 75% of the population in the city.

4. Make a comparison between US Indians studying English and Chinese Uighurs studying Chinese and let reader know why it is wrong for those Uighurs to choose to study Chinese and better suit the society.

5. Tell readers why rural Uighur youths should not seek factory work in East China (or “deportation” as Mr Restall wrote) to improve their living and help their family back in Xinjiang economically. Ms. Kadeer didn’t mention whether those Uighurs are happy with going out their rural home to work in East China (“deportation”) and make more money either.

I am a Han Chinese and am writing this out of my free will. This writing is NOT Chinese “government-orchestrated”.”

- Bible

Perfect description for the “free media”.

“Very obviously, Mr Hugo Restall of the WSJ Editorial Board has betrayed the very fundamental ethics of being fair when reporting. The whole article is filled with malicious and intentional distortion of facts were expressed in a very hidden way. For example,

1. the author did mention that “East Turkistan” existed in history but failed to tell the reader that the “East Turkistan” existed there only for less than 2 years and no western countries have every aknowledged its existence.

2. The author wants to blame everything of 75 on chinese government and misguided the readers. But the author from the human rights example country never expressed any concern and console to those 156 ppl killed in the riots, most of which are ethnic Han. THe author is so hypocritical that he wants the readers to believe all innocent Han deserve the death due to “political incorrectness”. Hugo, you really make sick.

3. THe author tends to believe everything Rebiya said and the most shameless words he used in the article is “round up” , which he even distorted what Rebiya said ” 10,000 ppl disappeared”. Why Mr Hugo did this? WHat makes me believe is that Mr Hugo wants to make a liar’s words more plausible.

4. This article is filled with ignorance of how China works, the majority thing the author writes here are one-sided story. The author repetitively emphasize the grievance of Uighur but even failed to give very very concrete example./

5. In summary, Hugo is a typical author who has been brainwashed by typical cold war propaganda.

Finally, the fact that Mr Hugo is a member of WSJ Editorial Board enhanced my faith that I should be no more a subscriber of WSJ. I don’t want to pay USD 99 to buy in information conferred by a typical cold war newspaper. Reading such things can only make ppl silly.

Finally to Mr Hugo: THERE IS NO WAY TO PREVENT CHINESE FROM MAINTAINING SOVEREIGNTY INTEGRITY. YOUR LOGIC THAT “HUMAN RIGHTS IS HIGHER THAN SOVEREIGNTY” WILL MEET VERY VERY VERY HIGH RESISTANCE FROM EVEN COMMON CHINESE PEOPLE.

AND MR HUGO , DON;’T POINT YOUR FINGERS TO OTHERS WHILE THE US AND THE WESTERN COUNTRIES THEMSELVES ARE SERIOUS VIOLATORS OF HUMAN RIGHTS THROUGHOUT THE HISTORY. DON’;T YOU FORGET THE SLAVE? THE CHINESE EXCLUSION LAW? THE ONSLAUGHTER OF NATIVE INDIANS? THE LYNCHING OF AFRICAN AMERICAN? THE KILLING OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS IN IRAQ AND AFHANISTAN?

While your hands are dirty, who gives the rights to blame others? Mr Hugo, I should say, the articles you write is an articles filled with distorted facts, hatred and lies. Maybe you also write an article on bin Laden, he defintely has something to say because he believes that western Muslims are discriminated and repressed.

Finally, Xinjiang will always be a part of China no matter what dirty lies WSJ writes.”

“The author reports the issue by believeing in one-sided hearing-saying without doing any real sense research on the subject. Some issues claimed are simply fale by a little sense of judgement.

Don’t say I am a nationalist for objecting your report and the people-like; I am a west-educated pro dem Chinese having lived in UK and HK for many years. In 1980s, in order to study abroad thus to have a better career future, I tried very hard to learn English; I sent my little girls to English school and it is more or less like me in many families of China. Would you call this as a culture genocide?

Read a little about Xiangjiang histroy. Uighurs as a tribe were formed by a mixture of different groups of people and it happened only in the medium history (roughly though Tan to Mongo). However, Han people had administrated and lived in the area for thousands years, earlier than the formation of Uighurs. So, don’t claim Xingjiang is the homeland of Uighurs excluding Han.

It is the basic human right that people in a country can move around to live for jobs or biz or whatsoever. Wouldn’t it ridiculous to expect to limit Han in the central area while all other people are allowed to freely move in the country; otherwise will you call it Han occupation?

I don’t like CCP regime and think its policies towards minorities may need to be scrutinized. However, no matter we like it or not, we should not meddle things up by supporting anything against CCP or accusing anything of CCP.

In fact, CCP has long executed policies in favor of minorities by which Han are actually discriminated, which CCP propagandaed it as for the “unity and harmony of Chinese family’. This tells the reason why CCP felt their feelings are badly hurted when something like Xingjiang and Tibetan happened.

It seems all the problems come from the regime which is called Communist or one party rule. Yes, we know the regime is not good and it is lack of democracy and it should be changed over time, but we do not agree to object it for whatesoever dissidents claimed. I believe people like me in China represent a majority force so China will be stable and continue to rise for many years to go.

Lastly, I do not think CCP is a Communist anymore, just as James Rogers said “China is probably the best capitalist country in the world”. Agreeing it or not and whatever the regime is, the current China regime suits for the current situation of the Chinese people. We expect an evolution within the CCP’s regime, not a revolutionary turmoil.

From the open-up of China in late 1970s, China has been learning West very hard in most times of the period just as I was educated and we see The USA as a model, the goal of life of my generation was to study abroad. After generations, China knows West much more actually than the West knows China, as China was less important to the West during the China’s learning West period, so that it is natural that much of the rencent changes happened inside China were overlooked by West. As China rises to the spotlight in recnet years, it is to the suprise of the West as China is still thought as a bad learning pupile who was not very obedient as East Europe and fromer USSR and came out through a method which was told wrong by the West teachers. So, I strongly suggest the West should go China to update while China should quicken the process of democracy and propaganda the world the nowadays China. “